Skip to content

Conversation

clickbait
Copy link

Master and slave are conventions that have stuck with all kinds of technology for years. For someone that's new to the Swift source, the Leader/follower convention makes little sense.

I see no reason to change a practice that has been the norm for many years.

Master and slave are conventions that have stuck with all kinds of technology for years. For someone that's new to the Swift source, the Leader/follower convention makes little sense.

I see no reason to change a practice that has been the norm for many years.
@phimage
Copy link

phimage commented Dec 5, 2015

SlaveString must be slaveString

@clickbait
Copy link
Author

@phimage I realised this right before you said it, and have fixed it.

@phimage
Copy link

phimage commented Dec 5, 2015

just an advice, squash your commit into one if you can, I see this request on other PR

@jckarter
Copy link
Contributor

jckarter commented Dec 5, 2015

See #218. There's no hierarchical relationship between these threads.

@jckarter jckarter closed this Dec 5, 2015
slavapestov pushed a commit to slavapestov/swift that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2018
tests: adjust printf for size types
dabelknap pushed a commit to dabelknap/swift that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2019
maldahleh pushed a commit to maldahleh/swift that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2020
freak4pc pushed a commit to freak4pc/swift that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants