[func-sig-opts] Add a new mangling for the guaranteed->owned transfor…

[gottesmm]

…mation.

I followed the example of the owned->guaranteed transformation.

rdar://38196046

[gottesmm]

@swift-ci smoke test

[slavapestov]

@rajbarik You might want to check out the code being edited by @gottesmm here -- it will give you ideas for how to implement the mangling for your existential specialization pass.

[eeckstein]

lgtm

[rajbarik]

Thanks. I think I did this already in the PR #13991 Do we care about these files? - lib/Demangling/OldDemangler.cpp <https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/16196/files#diff-4> - lib/Demangling/OldRemangler.cpp <https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/16196/files#diff-5>

…

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Slava Pestov ***@***.***> wrote: @rajbarik <https://github.com/rajbarik> You might want to check out the code being edited by @gottesmm <https://github.com/gottesmm> here -- it will give you ideas for how to implement the mangling for your existential specialization pass. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16196 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBwaTIAraohpOhi6icowJsxZonnTFN5ks5tsl8LgaJpZM4To7rF> .

[eeckstein]

@rajbarik In general yes. The old remangler is used to create runtime type names.
But for your change, no. A specialized function cannot be the context of a type.