Skip to content

Conversation

@briancroom
Copy link
Contributor

Re-attempt the change from #424 now that we require a Swift 6 toolchain to building the package.

@briancroom
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test

@stmontgomery
Copy link
Contributor

Package.swift defines an API availability macro _distantFuture, should we add a fake visionOS 99.0 to that list?

@stmontgomery stmontgomery added the bug 🪲 Something isn't working label Jun 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@stmontgomery stmontgomery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One suggestion about the package manifest but LGTM otherwise

@briancroom
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test

@briancroom briancroom merged commit 21b13a0 into main Jun 13, 2024
@briancroom briancroom deleted the bcroom/visionOS-availability branch June 13, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug 🪲 Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants