[6.0] Rename back to swift package completion-tool
#7602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The subcommand seems accidentally renamed to `swift package completion-command` while renaming the type name in swiftlang#7336 This change renames it back to `swift package completion-tool` keep compatibility with the previous version.
kateinoigakukun
requested review from
bnbarham,
MaxDesiatov and
tomerd
as code owners
|
@swift-ci test |
MaxDesiatov
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
MaxDesiatov
added
bug
swift 6.0
bnbarham
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
airspeedswift
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
|
Thanks @kateinoigakukun! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explanation: Renames the accidentally renamed subcommand back to
swift package completion-toolkeep compatibility with the previous version.Scope: Shell completion helper tool
Risk: Low.
Testing: Added a new test to ensure the subcommand name
Original PR: #7600
Reviewers: @MaxDesiatov