Skip to content

Conversation

@patrykstefanski
Copy link

If pointers don't have any interesting attributes, there is no need to attempt to merge the types, and we can keep the type unchanged. This will let us keep the sugars used in the new declaration.

rdar://153579566
(cherry picked from commit 0353029)

If pointers don't have any interesting attributes, there is no need to
attempt to merge the types, and we can keep the type unchanged. This
will let us keep the sugars used in the new declaration.

rdar://153579566
(cherry picked from commit 0353029)
@patrykstefanski patrykstefanski requested a review from a team as a code owner June 30, 2025 23:10
@patrykstefanski patrykstefanski added the clang:bounds-safety Issue relating to the experimental -fbounds-safety feature in Clang label Jun 30, 2025
@patrykstefanski
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@patrykstefanski
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test llvm

@rapidsna rapidsna merged commit 8835b75 into swift/release/6.2 Jul 8, 2025
5 checks passed
@rapidsna rapidsna deleted the eng/pstefanski/PR-153579566-6.2 branch July 8, 2025 18:43
patrykstefanski added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
rapidsna pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clang:bounds-safety Issue relating to the experimental -fbounds-safety feature in Clang

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants