fix: rpc call returns PostgrestFilterBuilder #50
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes supabase/supabase-swift#110
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Changes the return value of the
rpccall to returnPostgrestFilterBuilderinstead ofPostgrestTransformBuilder, which allows for use of the filter functions like.neq,.eq, etc.This appropriately changes the return value to be the same as in postgrest-js
What is the current behavior?
At the moment, an
.rpccall would returnPostgrestTransformBuilderwhich only has the available methodsselect,order,limit,range.Please link any relevant issues here.
supabase/supabase-swift#110
What is the new behavior?
The
.rpccall returns aPostgrestFilterBuilderobject.Additional context
New filter options compared to the other screenshot in the linked issue.
Tested a couple of filters and seems to work fine returning the expected data.