Upgrade to stac-fastapi v2.5.5 #237
Conversation
|
I don't know why the collections extension test broke? |
| collection.validate() | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.skip(reason="Broken as of stac-fastapi v2.5.5") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this fine to skip? Or do we need a new test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did make an issue for this. I am not too sure about collection extensions and if people are using them. Ideally we would understand why this test started failing. If no one knows why it's failing, it should be fine to skip it for now and have it referenced as an issue I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added a new test. It's working with adding a collection but not updating one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I went through this with the debugger and it seems like Pydantic is omitting the field when validating the request model (stac_fastapi.types.stac.Collection), only retaining the defined fields.
https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/blob/0.98.0/fastapi/dependencies/utils.py#L785
So I'd expect this to happen on all request models, but we just don't notice it on Items objects because all extra fields are defined inside the properties field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It makes sense but when I POST a collection and then GET the collection after, the iten_assets field is still there? It's only with PUT that it disappears?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I made an issue here - hopefully this can be straightened out with the upcoming stac-fastpapi v3.0.0
Related Issue(s):
Description:
Upgrade stac-fastapi libraries to v2.5.5
PR Checklist:
pre-commit run --all-files)make test)