Skip to content

Conversation

@steve-the-edwards
Copy link
Contributor

…ningSideEffect

Replace with runningSideEffect where possible or with a Worker instead of
Worker.

Closes #262

@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards force-pushed the sedwards/deprecate-create-side-effect branch from 7be9bf9 to 539c4c8 Compare August 25, 2021 19:27
…ningSideEffect

Replace with runningSideEffect where possible or with a Worker<Unit> instead of
Worker<Nothing>.
@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards force-pushed the sedwards/deprecate-create-side-effect branch from 539c4c8 to d09bf20 Compare August 25, 2021 20:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@rjrjr rjrjr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@steve-the-edwards
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the CI instrumentation was timing out on other PRs as well right @zach-klippenstein ?

@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards merged commit 7b77330 into main Aug 25, 2021
@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards deleted the sedwards/deprecate-create-side-effect branch August 25, 2021 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate Worker.createSideEffect in favor of suspend functions and runningSideEffect

3 participants