Support for multiple graphql schema files

[tobiolalusi]

The TypeDefinitionRegistry provides a .merge(TypedefinitionRegistry) to be able to merge multiple schema resources. This comes in mostly handy when the developer tries to create multiple graphql schema files to improve readability and simplicity. All these will be merged into one GraphQL schema/TypeDefinitionRegistry.

[bclozel]

Thanks @tobiolalusi - this is now fixed and will be available in our first milestone.

For now the configuration property must contain actual locations, e.g. classpath:/graphql/, under which we scan for *.graphqls files. We could have gone for full patterns instead, e.g. classpath:/graphql/*.graphqls, but I thought the former would align better with the existing Spring Boot properties.

Let me know if you had something else in mind!

[hantsy]

My previous location is classpath: schema/schema.graphql.

there is no way to make it work in the configuration of the new spring.graphql.schema.locations, I have to rename my schema folder.

[bclozel]

You mean you need to rename your schema file from schema.graphql to schema.graphqls?

Once done, the following should work:

spring.graphql.schema.locations=classpath:/schema/

[tobiolalusi]

There are several possible ways to name a GraphQL file. Could be with one of the following extensions: .graphqls, .graphql, .gql, .gqls. There are however no official standards for naming the files, but most commonly used ones is one of .graphql and .graphqls.

I could create a PR based on the current update that supports the above mentioned extensions, if need be.

[hantsy]

@bclozel I removed the config in my sample now and renamed my folders and schema file to follow the convention.

[bclozel]

@tobiolalusi @hantsy
Would something like the following address the use case in a more flexible way?

# default value
spring.graphql.schema.location-patterns=classpath:/schema/*.graphqls

# sample configuration
spring.graphql.schema.location-patterns=classpath:/schema/*.graphql, classpath:/graphql/other/*.gql

[rstoyanchev]

I think the way it works currently, based on root location is good and simple. We could expand that slightly to check for the additional suffixes and adapt to what's present. Given the combination of dedicated locations for such GraphQL schema files, as well as the rather specific suffixes, it shouldn't cause any surprises I think.

I can't see a good reason for other kinds of files to use such prefixes, and if they do they simply won't parse and it can't go unnoticed.

[tobiolalusi]

Unless, spring-graphql wants to create a standard, which in my opinion isn't a bad idea, the .graphqls extension is a good one. Apart from that, for a little more flexibility, I agree with @rstoyanchev, we could instead to adapt to the different standard graphql extensions.
As long as any file is in the spring.graphql.schema.locations and they have any of these extensions, they are valid graphql schema files.

[bclozel]

Reopening to look for well-known file extensions in the configured locations.