Reduce the code complexity by removing some conditional compilation blocks #300
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request does not change the semantics of the code, but just makes the code base more readable in fixing some style issues and making use of preprocessor defines instead of preprocessor conditional blocks where needed.
Example:
# ifdef CAF_MPI_LOCK_UNLOCK
MPI_Win_lock (MPI_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE, image_index-1, 0, win);
# endif // CAF_MPI_LOCK_UNLOCK
is replaced by:
CAF_Win_lock (MPI_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE, image_index-1, win);
and
# ifdef CAF_MPI_LOCK_UNLOCK
MPI_Win_unlock (image_index-1, win);
# else // CAF_MPI_LOCK_UNLOCK
MPI_Win_flush (image_index-1, win);
# endif // CAF_MPI_LOCK_UNLOCK
by:
CAF_Win_unlock (image_index-1, win);
Which IMHO is far more easier do grasp then the five like for the unlock/flush above. In lines 132 to 146 the defines are set appropriately.