Oops: "pids" -> "numeric userid" #98
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
"pids" is process ids, I think? What you mean is the users numeric id, e.g. on machine A `hartzell` is `3245` so files are owned by `3245`. But, when I get to machine B where `hartzell` is `22453`, those same files appear to be someone else. Right?
Member
|
I think this is an old paragraph from the first site, and I think that you're right about the use of user IDs instead of pids. pids doesn't make sense in the context. |
vsoch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2017
* adding troubleshooting for debian issue apptainer/singularity#845 * adding note about security implications * Typo: dummpy.img -> dummy.img (#94) Not sure if this was a typo or a snarky insider joke by a Perl/Ruby programmer.... * Typo: One -> On & wordsmithing (#95) * Type: One -> On * Wordsmithing * Fix inaccurate docker command description (#96) There is no `docker -ps` command. The docker `ps` subcommand lists containers. The docker `history` subcommand will list the layers, like so: ``` hartzelg@blah:~$ docker history hartzelg/cime IMAGE CREATED CREATED BY SIZE COMMENT 7185c64fa2a5 5 months ago /bin/sh -c #(nop) VOLUME [/cime_config.yaml] 0 B fd53e85b356b 5 months ago /bin/sh -c #(nop) VOLUME [/var/jenkins_home] 0 B b50f22ae6ec1 5 months ago /bin/sh -c #(nop) COPY file:fb917d778dfa959bb 10.11 kB [...] ``` * Typo: maybe -> may be (#97) * Oops: "pids" -> "numeric userid" (#98) "pids" is process ids, I think? What you mean is the users numeric id, e.g. on machine A `hartzell` is `3245` so files are owned by `3245`. But, when I get to machine B where `hartzell` is `22453`, those same files appear to be someone else. Right? * nothing to see here... * fixing environment variable example * Fix typo (#99) * $SINGULARITY_ENVIRONMENT, --nv, and random cleanup * removed Usage sections from commands * removed $SINGULARITY_ENVIRONMENT jazz from current docs * reverted docs-usage to old version * cleaning up the merge a bit more * finalizing and approving PR to close #100!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
"pids" is process ids, I think?
What you mean is the users numeric id, e.g. on machine A
hartzellis3245so files are owned by3245. But, when I get to machine B wherehartzellis22453, those same files appear to be someone else.Right?