Skip to content

Conversation

@gkubisa
Copy link
Contributor

@gkubisa gkubisa commented Mar 5, 2019

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.85% when pulling 31be02e on Teamwork:teamwork-websocket-json-stream into 02187ca on share:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.85% when pulling 31be02e on Teamwork:teamwork-websocket-json-stream into 02187ca on share:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.85% when pulling 31be02e on Teamwork:teamwork-websocket-json-stream into 02187ca on share:master.

Copy link
Contributor

@ericyhwang ericyhwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Before I merge, the example's otherwise fine with you?

Side note - I checked with Nate quickly, and when updating examples, he actually started on improving the client's handling of certain websocket libraries. Not directly related to the server websocket library.

@gkubisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

gkubisa commented Mar 6, 2019

Yes, it looks good to me.

@ericyhwang ericyhwang merged commit 17de0fd into share:master Mar 7, 2019
@gkubisa gkubisa deleted the teamwork-websocket-json-stream branch March 7, 2019 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants