Skip to content

Conversation

martonvago
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR is an alternative to #122 . It implements suggestion 5 listed on the issue.

Closes #120

Needs an in-depth review.

Checklist

  • Formatted Markdown
  • Ran just run-all

check: Callable[[Any], bool]
type: str = "custom"
check_missing: bool = False
_field_name: str = field(init=False, repr=False)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not exposing this in the constructor

@martonvago martonvago moved this from Todo to In Review in Iteration planning Oct 20, 2025
@martonvago martonvago mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2025
2 tasks
@martonvago martonvago marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2025 15:28
@martonvago martonvago requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2025 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: In Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rules with type="required"

1 participant