Skip to content

Conversation

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Member

Add numpy 1.25+ compatibility

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.68%. Comparing base (8e9cf90) to head (0bf60d3).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #96      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.32%   95.68%   -2.64%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines         417      417              
==========================================
- Hits          410      399      -11     
- Misses          7       18      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented May 8, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #96 will not alter performance

Comparing pa/old-numpy (0bf60d3) with main (8e9cf90)

Summary

✅ 160 untouched benchmarks

@flying-sheep flying-sheep added the run-gpu-ci Apply this label to run GPU CI once label May 8, 2025
@flying-sheep flying-sheep marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 15:16
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the run-gpu-ci Apply this label to run GPU CI once label May 8, 2025
@flying-sheep flying-sheep changed the title Pa/old-numpy Add support for numpy 1.25+ May 8, 2025
@flying-sheep flying-sheep added the run-gpu-ci Apply this label to run GPU CI once label May 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the run-gpu-ci Apply this label to run GPU CI once label May 9, 2025
@flying-sheep flying-sheep merged commit efe0308 into main May 9, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
@flying-sheep flying-sheep deleted the pa/old-numpy branch May 9, 2025 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants