fix(gas-oracle & rollup-relayer): blob base fee calculation based on excessBlobGas field

[colinlyguo]

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

• fix: A bug fix

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

• Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

• No, this PR is not a breaking change

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the application version to v4.5.23.
  • Upgraded an internal dependency to a newer version.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes update the version tag in the codebase from "v4.5.22" to "v4.5.23" and advance the github.com/scroll-tech/go-ethereum dependency in the rollup module to a newer commit. No other code or logic modifications are present.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
common/version/version.go	Updated version tag from "v4.5.22" to "v4.5.23".
rollup/go.mod	Updated go-ethereum dependency to a newer commit (June 2025).

Poem

A hop ahead, now twenty-three,
Dependencies fresh as can be.
The code moves on, no pause or rest,
Always striving to be its best.
With every tag, a new delight—
🐇🌿 Forward bound, in morning light!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package zstd: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec/encoding/zstd""
level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\nbuildir: failed to load package zstd: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec/encoding/zstd""

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b908f81 and 8a8fd9c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• rollup/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• common/version/version.go (1 hunks)
• rollup/go.mod (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)

• common/version/version.go
• rollup/go.mod

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.86%. Comparing base (82fb15d) to head (b908f81).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1676   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    40.86%   40.86%           
========================================
  Files          225      225           
  Lines        18075    18075           
========================================
  Hits          7387     7387           
  Misses        9970     9970           
  Partials       718      718           

Flag	Coverage Δ
rollup	49.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Thegaram]

lgtm, thought I'd prefer changing to the commit hash after the other PR is merged

[colinlyguo]

lgtm, thought I'd prefer changing to the commit hash after the other PR is merged

Also planned to. updated.