Fix bridge creation for value classes #603
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They declare final methods which are overriden in SyntheticMethods, which means that all value classes fail at runtime. Disabling them makes it possible to add run tests for value classes which will make it easier to experiment with changes to value classes.
As the comment in the code says: "In general, a bridge is needed when the signature of the closure method after Erasure contains an ErasedValueType but the corresponding type in the functional interface is not an ErasedValueType." So we need to check if _at least one_ of the type needs to be adapted, not if _all of them_ need to, the use of "forall" was an error.
DarkDimius
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2015
Fix bridge creation for value classes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As the comment in the code says:
"In general, a bridge is needed when the signature of the closure method after
Erasure contains an ErasedValueType but the corresponding type in the functional
interface is not an ErasedValueType."
So we need to check if at least one of the type needs to be adapted,
not if all of them need to, the use of "forall" was an error.
This Pull Request depends on #601
Review by @DarkDimius