Skip to content

Conversation

@saurabharch
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/homepage/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-MINDOCUMENT-13045385
  708  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @saurabharch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, focuses on enhancing the project's security posture by resolving a critical 'Prototype Pollution' vulnerability. It achieves this by updating several core npm packages to their more secure versions, ensuring the application remains robust against known exploits.

Highlights

  • Vulnerability Fix: This pull request addresses a 'Prototype Pollution' vulnerability (SNYK-JS-MINDOCUMENT-13045385) with a severity score of 708, identified in the project's npm dependencies.
  • Dependency Upgrades: To mitigate the identified vulnerability, several key npm dependencies have been upgraded to their latest versions, including algoliasearch, gatsby, gatsby-plugin-sharp, gatsby-remark-images, and gatsby-transformer-sharp.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a security vulnerability by updating several dependencies. However, it introduces multiple major version upgrades for critical packages like gatsby and algoliasearch. These upgrades contain significant breaking changes, as noted by Snyk itself (isBreakingChange:true). Merging this PR as-is, without the necessary code migrations to support these new versions, will almost certainly break the application. The codebase must be carefully refactored to align with the new APIs and conventions of the updated dependencies before this PR can be safely merged.

"@react-hook/mouse-position": "^1.0.3",
"@sindresorhus/slugify": "^0.9.1",
"algoliasearch": "^3.24.5",
"algoliasearch": "^4.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Upgrading algoliasearch from v3 to v4 is a major change that includes breaking API changes. The client initialization, search methods, and response structures have been updated. All code interacting with the Algolia API must be refactored according to the Algolia JavaScript client v3 to v4 migration guide. Without these code changes, search functionality will fail.

"date-fns": "1.30.1",
"framer-motion": "^1.6.14",
"gatsby": "^2.13.45",
"gatsby": "^3.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This PR upgrades Gatsby from v2 to v3, along with related plugins like gatsby-plugin-sharp (v2 to v3), gatsby-remark-images (v3 to v5), and gatsby-transformer-sharp (v2 to v3). These are major version updates with significant breaking changes. The codebase needs to be updated according to the official Gatsby v2 to v3 migration guide. For example, gatsby-image is deprecated in favor of gatsby-plugin-image. Merging these dependency updates without the required code refactoring will break the build and the website.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants