nested styles refer to top-level parent in sourcemap line number

[opeologist]

i'm creating this issue here to get more visibility on an issue i originally opened in the node-sass repo. link here: sass/node-sass#1206

i'm having an issue where my nested styles' sourcemap line number in chrome is referencing the top-most parent selector line and not the line that the nested selector starts.

body {
  h1 {
    background: #f00;
  }
}

will show file.scss:1 instead of file.scss:2 for the h1

i've tried outputting the map file to a separate file and embedding it, all the same.

---

---

just ran a test with the latest ruby sass and it's sourcemapping nested children on the child's line and not the top-most parent like it should be. this is definitely a bug and isn't working as intended.

Ruby Sass 3.4.19:

body {
  h1 {
    background: red;
  }
}

compiles to:

body h1 {
  background: red; }

/*# sourceMappingURL=core.css.map */

core.css.map:

{
"version": 3,
"mappings": "AACE,OAAG;EACD,UAAU,EAAE,GAAG",
"sources": ["core.scss"],
"names": [],
"file": "core.css"
}

---

node-sass 3.4.1:

body {
  h1 {
    background: red;
  }
}

compiles to:

body h1 {
  background: red; }

/*# sourceMappingURL=core.css.map */

core.css.map:

{
    "version": 3,
    "file": "core.css",
    "sources": [
        "core.scss"
    ],
    "mappings": "AAAA,IAAI,CACF,EAAE,CAAC;EACD,UAAU,EAAE,GAAI,GACjB",
    "names": []
}

[nek4life]

Having the same issue with python-libsass, it seems it's the underlying libsass implementation of sourcemaps

[mgreter]

I do see your point. But unfortunately libsass technically does the correct thing and in some way chrome also reports the correct thing. It actually shows where the first selector in the sequence is declared. And this is basically not what one would probably expect, specially given that chrome doesn't use much of the information that would be available via the source-map. BTW. with less you also get that line reported.

Also be aware that sourcemaps v3 are still just a proposal, so any implementation could be questioned. Unfortunately for libsass it seems that all browsers that support css sourcemaps agree to report this information that way. IMHO this is not really correct, since in that situation I would expect them to report where the scope/ruleset for the styles is opened (and we actually have a sourcemap pointer there).

I'm reluctant to remove all mappings we currently have, since they are technically correct and could be very usefull for more advanced inspector tools. But I see the pain point and currently no such advanced tooling exists, so I'm willing to add a crutch to make this more usefull in the meantime (#1759). Btw. the v3 proposals were lately extended with some notions of Multi-level Mapping Notes, which is pretty much what we try to do with sourcemaps already.

[opeologist]

thank you so much @mgreter, so i should use that branch for now to get the sourcemapping i'd like?

[mgreter]

Here are the corresponding bug reports for less (less/less.js#1492) and the one for chromium (https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=287382).

[mgreter]

@tehOPEologist I would advise people to just ctrl click on the actual (ie. first) style rules 😉

[opeologist]

@mgreter so there isn't a fix for this currently is what you're saying? i'm confused by your "ctrl+click" comment, as that would just bring up the file itself and the first selector.. doesn't go to the line where the style you've clicked on is.

[mgreter]

Not sure if we add the crutch mentioned before, since it is a browser issue and there is a way in chrome to get to the correct place by ctrl+click (see screenshot, you could also ctrl+click on the color). Just to be clear, hold ctrl and click on background (or red) will bring you to the right position.

[opeologist]

ahh nice, thanks i guess i can use that for now till it gets cleared up in chrome. thanks again!

[mgreter]

Just a note: this is not possible in firefox currently, but I hope they will adapt the behavior of chrome (and I'm pretty positive since the dev tools in firefox are pretty new and quite actively developed atm).