pyOpenSSL SPKG

[kini]

pyOpenSSL 0.13 doesn't build on systems with sufficiently old OpenSSL versions. A patch exists for this but has not been included upstream. So, we have to make an SPKG.

(This SPKG continues the history of an old pyOpenSSL SPKG I found somewhere.)

Install this spkg.

Depends on #13121

CC: @novoselt

Component: packages: optional

Keywords: OpenSSL pyOpenSSL spkg

Author: Keshav Kini

Reviewer: John Palmieri

Merged: sage-5.4.beta0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13384

[kini]

Changed keywords from none to OpenSSL pyOpenSSL spkg

[kini]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
 pyOpenSSL 0.13 doesn't build on systems with sufficiently old OpenSSL versions. A patch exists for this but has not been included upstream. So, we have to make an SPKG.
 
 (This SPKG continues the history of an old pyOpenSSL SPKG I found somewhere.)
+
+SPKG: http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg

[kini]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
 
 (This SPKG continues the history of an old pyOpenSSL SPKG I found somewhere.)
 
-SPKG: http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg
+Apply [attachment: trac_13384-deps.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage/files/ticket13384/trac_13384-deps.patch.gz) to `$SAGE_ROOT`, and place [this spkg](http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg) in `$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard`.

[kini]

comment:4

Setting this ticket to depend on #13121 because the current sagenb SPKG will overwrite this pyOpenSSL with its own internally included pyOpenSSL 0.12, making it difficult to test this SPKG.

[kini]

Dependencies: #13121

[kini]

comment:6

Actually maybe we should make this an optional SPKG. It looks like we barely use OpenSSL at all - we can probably just wrap the import and handle it gracefully when pyOpenSSL isn't installed. See also William's comments a while ago here.

[kini]

comment:7

See #13385.

[kini]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
 
 (This SPKG continues the history of an old pyOpenSSL SPKG I found somewhere.)
 
-Apply [attachment: trac_13384-deps.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage/files/ticket13384/trac_13384-deps.patch.gz) to `$SAGE_ROOT`, and place [this spkg](http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg) in `$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard`.
+Install [this spkg](http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg). For testing you should probably wait until #13121 is merged, and then test on a clean new version of Sage.

[jhpalmieri]

comment:9

Keshav: the naming convention for spkgs seems to be to use lowercase almost exclusively. So I would suggest calling this "pyopenssl".

[kini]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
 
 (This SPKG continues the history of an old pyOpenSSL SPKG I found somewhere.)
 
-Install [this spkg](http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyOpenSSL-0.13.p0.spkg). For testing you should probably wait until #13121 is merged, and then test on a clean new version of Sage.
+Install [this spkg](http://wstein.org/home/keshav/files/pyopenssl-0.13.p0.spkg). For testing you should probably wait until #13121 is merged, and then test on a clean new version of Sage.