Add a multi-partition implementation to sage

[pabryan]

As discussed here[1], multi-partitions would be a useful addition to sage. I have an initial implementation soon to be uploaded.

[1] http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/browse_thread/thread/aefcc71ad217d023/439360dc6b2641c5

Apply: attachment: trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch

Component: combinatorics

Keywords: multipartition multi-partition multi-partite multipartite partition

Author: Amritanshu Prasad

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Merged: sage-5.12.beta0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10630

[pabryan]

Changed author from pabryan to Paul Bryan

[pabryan]

Implementation of multi-partitions

[EmmanuelJeanBriand]

comment:2

Attachment: trac_10630_multi_partitions.patch.gz

Some comments:

• The functions for multipartitions do not seem to work correctly. Here is an incorrect (incomplete) result:

 
M=MultiPartitions([2,2])
for x in M.list(): print x
[[2, 2]]
[[1, 2], [1, 0]]
[[2, 1], [0, 1]]
[[1, 0], [1, 0], [0, 2]]
[[1, 1], [1, 0], [0, 1]]
[[2, 0], [0, 1], [0, 1]]
[[1, 0], [1, 0], [0, 1], [0, 1]]

Two multipartitions are missed: [[1,1],[1,1]] and [[2,0],[0,2]]

• I wonder whether MultiPartitions is a good name, because it seems it has a different meaning in a near context. See for instance this paper by G. Andrews: http://es.scribd.com/doc/6625886/Multi-Partitions, or this other paper; http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~mf/papers/weight2.pdf, or these slides: http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~goddard/MINI/2009/Swisher.pdf ."Vector partitions" may be safer (it is used for instance by George Andrews in his book on partitions).

• Should one represent the Multipartitions as lists of vectors with integer coordinates rather than lists of lists ? (because sometimes one has to do the sum of the parts).

• A few typos:

  • Line 6 of the file: "the" should not be repeated.
  • Line 9 of the file: replace "it's" with "its".
  • Line 63 of the file: replace "lexicographically order integer lists" with "lexicographically weakly decreasing lists of integers" or something better.
  • Also, one might replace the definition of multipartition as "equivalence class of tuples" (lines 4 to 10) with "multiset of tuples".

[amritanshu-prasad]

Changed author from Paul Bryan to Amritanshu Prasad

[amritanshu-prasad]

Description changed:

--- 
+++ 
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
 As discussed here[1], multi-partitions would be a useful addition to sage. I have an initial implementation soon to be uploaded.
 
 [1] http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/browse_thread/thread/aefcc71ad217d023/439360dc6b2641c5
+
+Apply: [attachment: trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch](https://github.com/sagemath/sage-prod/files/10651890/trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch.gz)

[amritanshu-prasad]

comment:3

Vector partitions is now implemented. I am calling it VectorPartitions instead of MutliPartitions, to remove the conflict with the standard usage of the latter.

Apply: trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch

[amritanshu-prasad]

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

[tscrim]

comment:4

Attachment: trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch.gz

Looks good to me.

Apply: trac_10630-vector_partition-ap.patch