Skip to content

Improve check for presence of statements in a block #4628

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2021
Merged

Improve check for presence of statements in a block #4628

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c0161c7
refactor: cleanup block check for statements
calebcartwright Jan 7, 2021
516e6a5
tests: don't strip empty tuple exprs in blocks
calebcartwright Jan 7, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 4 additions & 12 deletions src/formatting/expr.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1206,18 +1206,10 @@ pub(crate) fn is_simple_block_stmt(
}

fn block_has_statements(block: &ast::Block) -> bool {
block.stmts.iter().any(|stmt| match stmt.kind {
ast::StmtKind::Semi(ref expr) => {
if let ast::ExprKind::Tup(ref tup_exprs) = expr.kind {
if tup_exprs.is_empty() {
return false;
}
}
true
}
ast::StmtKind::Empty => false,
_ => true,
})
!block
.stmts
.iter()
.all(|stmt| matches!(stmt.kind, ast::StmtKind::Empty))
}

/// Checks whether a block contains no statements, expressions, comments, or
Expand Down
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion tests/target/issue_3868.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,4 +4,6 @@ fn bar() {
for _ in 0..1 {}
}

fn baz() {}
fn baz() {
();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We were only doing this before because at the time this issue was resolved the rustc parser/AST didn't allow us to differentiate between these empty tuple exprs in statement position and a plain old empty semi ;

}