Skip to content

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Since we got a new bootstrap, we can give this a shot.

r? @oli-obk

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 12, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 12, 2022
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

LGTM. :)
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2022

📌 Commit a6c6fa0 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 12, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a6c6fa0 with merge 546c826...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing 546c826 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 12, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 546c826 into rust-lang:master Jun 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 12, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

📣 Toolstate changed by #98018!

Tested on commit 546c826.
Direct link to PR: #98018

💔 miri on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).
💔 miri on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).

rust-highfive added a commit to rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2022
Tested on commit rust-lang/rust@546c826.
Direct link to PR: <rust-lang/rust#98018>

💔 miri on windows: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).
💔 miri on linux: test-pass → build-fail (cc @oli-obk @eddyb @RalfJung).
@scottmcm scottmcm deleted the miri-yeet branch June 13, 2022 00:10
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (546c826): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
1.1% 1.1% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-0.6% -0.6% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) 1.1% 1.1% 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.9% 2.9% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants