Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 11, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez,@Folyd,@jsha

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 11, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2022 11:25
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2022

📌 Commit fb68e0b has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 11, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97904 (Small grammar fix in the compile_error documentation)
 - rust-lang#97943 (line 1352, change `self` to `*self`, other to `*other`)
 - rust-lang#97969 (Make -Cpasses= only apply to pre-link optimization)
 - rust-lang#97990 (Add more eslint checks)
 - rust-lang#97994 (feat(fix): update some links in `hir.rs`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c82bc1e into rust-lang:master Jun 11, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 11, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the eslint-checks branch June 11, 2022 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants