Skip to content

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Closes #54779
r? @jackh726

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 1, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 1, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

r? @compiler-errors could you also take a look at this? Jack seems busy with other work.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 13, 2022

📌 Commit 5db0316 has been approved by compiler-errors

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 13, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 13, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#96154 (Expand core::hint::unreachable_unchecked() docs)
 - rust-lang#96615 (Add a regression test for rust-lang#54779)
 - rust-lang#96982 (fix clippy expect_fun_call)
 - rust-lang#97003 (Remove some unnecessary `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable` attributes.)
 - rust-lang#97011 (Add regression test for rust-lang#28935)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 281be09 into rust-lang:master May 13, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone May 13, 2022
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the test-54779 branch May 13, 2022 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

confusing error message around trait object bound
6 participants