Skip to content

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 24, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 24, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 24, 2022

📌 Commit d76101d has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 24, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2022

⌛ Testing commit d76101d with merge 69a6d12...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 69a6d12 to beta...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 25, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 69a6d12 into rust-lang:beta Apr 25, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Apr 25, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the beta-next branch May 13, 2022 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants