Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc #94154
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-check-cfg
branch
from
b5de273 to
6741b88
Compare
rustbot
added
the
T-rustdoc
|
This was a weird! Simply doing this I had to manually had some extra normalizations (based on other rustdoc test) to make it fail locally. I think it will now pass on CI as well. |
|
Can you also add it into the rustdoc book please? Also cc @petrochenkov @camelid |
|
I don't have context for this change, but I don't think it's really necessary to discuss it now since it's unstable? |
This was referenced Feb 21, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2022
Add -Z check-cfg-features to enable compile-time checking of features This pull-request implements the "[Cargo support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3013-conditional-compilation-checking.html#cargo-support)" section of [RFC 3013: Checking conditional compilation at compile time](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3013-conditional-compilation-checking.html#checking-conditional-compilation-at-compile-time). The support is added in the form of an new unstable flags: `-Z check-cfg-features` that pass all possible features of a package to `rustc` unstable `--check-cfg` command line as `--check-cfg=values(feature, ...)`. This enables compile time checking of `feature` values in `#[cfg]`, `cfg!` and `#[cfg_attr]`. This new flag currently only affects `rustc` but `rustdoc` support will be added as soon as [it's support](rust-lang/rust#94154) is merged. Note than the intent is that this command line options become the default when stabilizing as suggested in the RFC: > [..] it seems uncontroversial for Cargo to enable checking for feature = "..." values immediately [..]
Urgau
force-pushed
the
rustdoc-check-cfg
branch
from
176df64 to
a31ae15
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2022
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit a31ae15 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2022
…eGomez Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc This pull-request wire up the new unstable `--check-cfg` option from `rustc` to `rustdoc` as [requested](rust-lang#93915 (comment)) in the [pull-request](rust-lang#93915) that introduce `--check-cfg`. The motivation was describe in the original PR by `@jyn514` who wrote rust-lang#89346 (comment): > > add plumbing to pass --check-cfg from rustdoc (do we want this one?) > > It would be useful, I think, it catches issues like cfg(doctst) or something (and in general I would like expansion to match rustc as closely as possible).
This was referenced Feb 25, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#93850 (Don't ICE when an extern static is too big for the current architecture) - rust-lang#94154 (Wire up unstable rustc --check-cfg to rustdoc) - rust-lang#94353 (Fix debug_assert in unused lint pass) - rust-lang#94366 (Add missing item to release notes) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2022
Add -Z check-cfg-features support for rustdoc This PR is a follow to #10408 where support for compile-time checking of features was implemented for `rustc`. At the time `rustdoc` support wasn't yet merged, but now that it has been [merged](rust-lang/rust#94154), this pull-request add support for it in the `doc` and `test --doc` (doctest) mode. r? `@alexcrichton`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull-request wire up the new unstable
--check-cfgoption fromrustctorustdocas requested in the pull-request that introduce--check-cfg.The motivation was describe in the original PR by @jyn514 who wrote #89346 (comment):