- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 13.9k
 
rustdoc: add test case for multiple traits and erased names #93339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
            bors
  merged 1 commit into
  rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/test-generics-multi-trait
  
      
      
   
  Jan 28, 2022 
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            rustdoc: add test case for multiple traits and erased names #93339
                    bors
  merged 1 commit into
  rust-lang:master
from
notriddle:notriddle/test-generics-multi-trait
  
      
      
   
  Jan 28, 2022 
              
            Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    | 
          
 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)  | 
    
6eb3fb1    to
    ab0589f      
    Compare
  
    
      
        
              This comment has been minimized.
        
        
      
    
  This comment has been minimized.
ab0589f    to
    e4199b6      
    Compare
  
    e4199b6    to
    f5cdfb4      
    Compare
  
    
              
                    GuillaumeGomez
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Jan 27, 2022 
                  
              
              
            
            
| 
           Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup  | 
    
| 
           📌 Commit f5cdfb4 has been approved by   | 
    
    
  bors 
      added a commit
        to rust-lang-ci/rust
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jan 27, 2022 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91641 (Define c_char using cfg_if rather than repeating 40-line cfg) - rust-lang#92899 (Mention std::iter::zip in Iterator::zip docs) - rust-lang#93193 (Add test for stable hash uniqueness of adjacent field values) - rust-lang#93325 (Introduce a limit to Levenshtein distance computation) - rust-lang#93339 (rustdoc: add test case for multiple traits and erased names) - rust-lang#93357 (Clarify the `usage-of-qualified-ty` error message.) - rust-lang#93363 (`#[rustc_pass_by_value]` cleanup) - rust-lang#93365 (More arena cleanups) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      Labels
      
    S-waiting-on-bors
  Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. 
  
    T-rustdoc
  Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. 
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
#92339 (comment)