Skip to content

Conversation

durin42
Copy link
Contributor

@durin42 durin42 commented Oct 18, 2021

I'm working on some LLVM patches in concert with a Rust patch, and it's
helping me quite a bit to have this as an option. It doesn't seem that
hard, so I figured I'd formalize it in x.py and send it upstream.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 18, 2021
I'm working on some LLVM patches in concert with a Rust patch, and it's
helping me quite a bit to have this as an option. It doesn't seem that
hard, so I figured I'd formalize it in x.py and send it upstream.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 20, 2021

📌 Commit f2a234e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 20, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2021
…mulacrum

config: add the option to enable LLVM tests

I'm working on some LLVM patches in concert with a Rust patch, and it's
helping me quite a bit to have this as an option. It doesn't seem that
hard, so I figured I'd formalize it in x.py and send it upstream.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2021
…mulacrum

config: add the option to enable LLVM tests

I'm working on some LLVM patches in concert with a Rust patch, and it's
helping me quite a bit to have this as an option. It doesn't seem that
hard, so I figured I'd formalize it in x.py and send it upstream.
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
…mulacrum

config: add the option to enable LLVM tests

I'm working on some LLVM patches in concert with a Rust patch, and it's
helping me quite a bit to have this as an option. It doesn't seem that
hard, so I figured I'd formalize it in x.py and send it upstream.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#86984 (Reject octal zeros in IPv4 addresses)
 - rust-lang#87440 (Remove unnecessary condition in Barrier::wait())
 - rust-lang#88644 (`AbstractConst` private fields)
 - rust-lang#89292 (Stabilize CString::from_vec_with_nul[_unchecked])
 - rust-lang#90010 (Avoid overflow in `VecDeque::with_capacity_in()`.)
 - rust-lang#90029 (Add test for debug logging during incremental compilation)
 - rust-lang#90031 (config: add the option to enable LLVM tests)
 - rust-lang#90048 (Add test for line-number setting)
 - rust-lang#90071 (Remove hir::map::blocks and use FnKind instead)
 - rust-lang#90074 (2229 migrations small cleanup)
 - rust-lang#90077 (Make `From` impls of NonZero integer const.)
 - rust-lang#90097 (Add test for duplicated sidebar entries for reexported macro)
 - rust-lang#90098 (Add test to ensure that the missing_doc_code_examples is not triggered on foreign trait implementations)
 - rust-lang#90099 (Fix MIRI UB in `Vec::swap_remove`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 632f06d into rust-lang:master Oct 21, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Oct 21, 2021
@durin42 durin42 deleted the allow-llvm-tests branch December 16, 2021 22:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants