Skip to content

Conversation

klensy
Copy link
Contributor

@klensy klensy commented Jun 5, 2021

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 5, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Jun 5, 2021

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 56a2a2a with merge 951df56d7e55a519362d18ac980416c51d1ac44d...

@jyn514 jyn514 added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-parser Area: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an AST labels Jun 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 951df56d7e55a519362d18ac980416c51d1ac44d (951df56d7e55a519362d18ac980416c51d1ac44d)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 951df56d7e55a519362d18ac980416c51d1ac44d with parent ac3e680, future comparison URL.

@petrochenkov petrochenkov removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 5, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (951df56d7e55a519362d18ac980416c51d1ac44d): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jun 6, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Jun 6, 2021

Perf looks like noise, but this is a nice cleanup anyway.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2021

📌 Commit 56a2a2a has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2021
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85436 (Avoid cloning cache key)
 - rust-lang#85772 (Preserve metadata w/ Solaris-like linkers.)
 - rust-lang#85920 (Tweak wasm_base target spec to indicate linker is not GNU and update linker inferring logic for wasm-ld.)
 - rust-lang#85930 (Update standard library for IntoIterator implementation of arrays )
 - rust-lang#85972 (Rustdoc html fixes)
 - rust-lang#86028 (Drop an `if let` that will always succeed)
 - rust-lang#86043 (don't clone attrs)
 - rust-lang#86047 (Don't fire `invalid_doc_attributes` on `extern crate` items)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2f0a855 into rust-lang:master Jun 6, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone Jun 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-parser Area: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an AST S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants