Skip to content

Conversation

ptrojahn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @matthewjasper

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 23, 2021
@matthewjasper
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 25, 2021

📌 Commit 0a80cc4 has been approved by matthewjasper

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 25, 2021
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2021
…asper

Replace Local::new(1) with CAPTURE_STRUCT_LOCAL
This was referenced May 25, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 25, 2021
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#85361 (Use TargetTriple::from_path in rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#85605 (Replace Local::new(1) with CAPTURE_STRUCT_LOCAL)
 - rust-lang#85631 (Move keyword primitive css dom)
 - rust-lang#85644 (Better English for documenting when to use unimplemented!())
 - rust-lang#85650 (Add some backticks to the `rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::Adjustment` docs)
 - rust-lang#85657 (Remove doubled braces in non_exhaustive structs’ documentation text.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ad72247 into rust-lang:master May 25, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants