Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

The rustdoc-gui tests were randomly run. Not really a big issue but I prefer the tests to be sorted.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 6, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 6, 2021

📌 Commit cdbfea5 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 7, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#84779 (Add support for --test-args to cargotest)
 - rust-lang#84781 (Don't check bootstrap artifacts by default)
 - rust-lang#84787 (bump deps)
 - rust-lang#84815 (Update coverage docs and command line help)
 - rust-lang#84875 (Removes unneeded check of `#[no_coverage]` in mapgen)
 - rust-lang#84897 (Coverage instruments closure bodies in macros (not the macro body))
 - rust-lang#84911 (Retry clang+llvm download)
 - rust-lang#84972 (CTFE inbounds-error-messages tweak)
 - rust-lang#84990 (Sort rustdoc-gui tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 87faf2e into rust-lang:master May 7, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 7, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the sort-rustdoc-gui-tests branch May 7, 2021 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants