Skip to content

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

tspiteri and others added 17 commits September 23, 2020 12:01
With this commit, the examples for exp_m1 would fail if x.exp() - 1.0
is used instead of x.exp_m1().
With this commit, the examples for ln_1p would fail if (x + 1.0).ln()
is used instead of x.ln_1p().
When calling a function that doesn't exist inside of a trait's
associated `fn`, and another associated `fn` in that trait has that
name, suggest calling it with the appropriate fully-qualified path.

Expand the label to be more descriptive.

Prompted by the following user experience:
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/cannot-find-function/50663
Directly casting the opaque pointer was [reported] to cause an
"incomplete type" error with GCC 9.3:

```
llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:939:31:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/9.3/type_traits:1301:12: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata'
 1301 |     struct is_base_of
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from [...]/rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm-c/BitReader.h:23,
                 from llvm-wrapper/LLVMWrapper.h:1,
                 from llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:1:
[...]/rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm-c/Types.h:89:16: note: forward declaration of 'struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata'
   89 | typedef struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata *LLVMMetadataRef;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```

[reported]: https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/182449tcompilerhelp/12215halprustcllvmbuildfail.html#214915124

A simple `unwrap` fixes the issue.
Add std::panic::panic_any.

The discussion of #67984 lead to the conclusion that there should be a macro or function separate from `std::panic!()` for throwing arbitrary payloads, to make it possible to deprecate or disallow (in edition 2021) `std::panic!(arbitrary_payload)`.

Alternative names:

- `panic_with!(..)`
- ~~`start_unwind(..)`~~ (panicking doesn't always unwind)
- `throw!(..)`
- `panic_throwing!(..)`
- `panic_with_value(..)`
- `panic_value(..)`
- `panic_with(..)`
- `panic_box(..)`
- `panic(..)`

The equivalent (private, unstable) function in `libstd` is called `std::panicking::begin_panic`.

I suggest `panic_any`, because it allows for any (`Any + Send`) type.

_Tracking issue: #78500_
Add regression test

This adds a regression test for #75777, effectively closing it since it is solved on nightly and beta.

Closes #75777
make exp_m1 and ln_1p examples more representative of use

With this PR, the examples for `exp_m1` would fail if `x.exp() - 1.0` is used instead of `x.exp_m1()`, and the examples for `ln_1p` would fail if `(x + 1.0).ln()` is used instead of `x.ln_1p()`.
Suggest calling associated `fn` inside `trait`s

When calling a function that doesn't exist inside of a trait's
associated `fn`, and another associated `fn` in that trait has that
name, suggest calling it with the appropriate fully-qualified path.

Expand the label to be more descriptive.

Prompted by the following user experience:
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/cannot-find-function/50663
rustc_llvm: unwrap LLVMMetadataRef before casting

Directly casting the opaque pointer was [reported] to cause an
"incomplete type" error with GCC 9.3:

```
llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:939:31:   required from here
/usr/include/c++/9.3/type_traits:1301:12: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata'
 1301 |     struct is_base_of
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from [...]/rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm-c/BitReader.h:23,
                 from llvm-wrapper/LLVMWrapper.h:1,
                 from llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:1:
[...]/rust/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm-c/Types.h:89:16: note: forward declaration of 'struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata'
   89 | typedef struct LLVMOpaqueMetadata *LLVMMetadataRef;
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```

[reported]: https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/182449tcompilerhelp/12215halprustcllvmbuildfail.html#214915124

A simple `unwrap` fixes the issue.

r? @eddyb
Add a test for compiletest rustc-env & unset-rustc-env directives

... and move compiletest meta tests into a separate directory.
@jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@rustbot modify labels: rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 30, 2020

📌 Commit 289b273 has been approved by jonas-schievink

@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 30, 2020
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 30, 2020
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Oct 30, 2020

Hm, the queue is standing still without any pending PRs?

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 30, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 289b273 with merge 918da4575d99ac3b1910f2c77c7ca3b182e1d9ee...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 30, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 30, 2020
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the rollup-q6s08p2 branch October 31, 2020 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants