Skip to content

Conversation

@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Jul 31, 2020

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 31, 2020
Comment on lines -122 to -129
for param in &mut params {
match param.kind {
clean::GenericParamDefKind::Type { ref mut bounds, .. } => {
*bounds = mem::take(bounds);
}
_ => panic!("expected only type parameters"),
}
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lcnr lcnr Jul 31, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I missing something here?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me! It even simplifies the code so that's great. 👍

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

📌 Commit b90bc8d has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

⌛ Testing commit b90bc8d with merge 5720e5675920c1f6ca4664c8f13ce75af150bcab...

@ollie27 ollie27 added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Hmm, surprised that CI builds are taking three hours again

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 1, 2020
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Aug 1, 2020

Let's see if this was spurious I guess

@bors r=GuillaumeGomez

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • This pull request previously failed. You should add more commits to fix the bug, or use retry to trigger a build again.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 1, 2020

📌 Commit b90bc8d has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 1, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#74602 (Clarify the doc for MaybeUninit::zeroed on incorrect use)
 - rust-lang#74720 (Clean up E0728 explanation)
 - rust-lang#74992 (fix rustdoc generic param order)
 - rust-lang#75015 (Add Vec::spare_capacity_mut)
 - rust-lang#75022 (Use a slice pattern instead of rchunks_exact(_).next())

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 98a9397 into rust-lang:master Aug 2, 2020
@lcnr lcnr deleted the fix-generic-param-order branch August 2, 2020 06:29
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Send/Sync type parameters come after const parameters in docs

8 participants