Replace core::iter::AlwaysOk<T> by Result<T, !>
#50941
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
scottmcm
approved these changes
May 26, 2018
|
Ping from triage, @withoutboats ! |
|
Ping from triage, @withoutboats / @rust-lang/libs, this PR needs your review! |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit a5f8572 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
🔒 Merge conflict |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
@bors r=sfackler |
|
📌 Commit 8ae1889 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2018
Replace `core::iter::AlwaysOk<T>` by `Result<T, !>` #43278 has been fixed, so we don't need this struct anymore. (Actually we don't even need `.unwrap()` thanks to `#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)]`)
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#43278 has been fixed, so we don't need this struct anymore.
(Actually we don't even need
.unwrap()thanks to#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)])