Skip to content

Conversation

Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor

@Zoxc Zoxc commented Apr 30, 2018

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 30, 2018
@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented Apr 30, 2018

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2018

⌛ Trying commit 3d038cc with merge 0f8ec0a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2018
[WIP] Only lookup types in one interner
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
State: approved= try=True

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned eddyb and unassigned petrochenkov Apr 30, 2018
@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented Apr 30, 2018

@Mark-Simulacrum I'd like a perf run here

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Perf queued (and started).

@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented May 1, 2018

let flags = super::flags::FlagComputation::for_sty(&st);

if flags.flags.intersects(ty::TypeFlags::KEEP_IN_LOCAL_TCX) != true {
eprintln!("MISMATCH TRUE {:?}", st);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to remove these eprintln!s? You already have asserts here.

@@ -250,3 +250,160 @@ impl FlagComputation {
}
}
}

pub(crate) fn sty_in_local_arena(st: &ty::TypeVariants) -> bool {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't you reuse TypeVisitor for this? Seems like a lot of code IMO.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented May 1, 2018

LGTM, modulo the implementation duplicating a lot of logic.

@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the interner-split branch from fcb43fb to 1fc4ad7 Compare May 1, 2018 12:49
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the interner-split branch from 239c586 to d452c3e Compare May 2, 2018 10:11
@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented May 2, 2018

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 2, 2018

⌛ Trying commit d452c3e with merge 116cf1c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2018
[WIP] Only lookup types in one interner
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 2, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
State: approved= try=True

@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented May 2, 2018

@Mark-Simulacrum I'd like another perf run to see if the fast path helps

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Perf queued.

@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 3, 2018
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented May 4, 2018

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented May 6, 2018

@Zoxc @eddyb Perf result is now available.

@bors try- clean

@kennytm kennytm removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 6, 2018
@shepmaster shepmaster added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2018
@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the interner-split branch from d452c3e to 9fe197d Compare May 7, 2018 11:11
@Zoxc Zoxc changed the title [WIP] Only lookup types in one interner Only lookup types in one interner May 7, 2018
@Zoxc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zoxc commented May 7, 2018

It seems like the fast-path wasn't a win. I've removed it and also applied the transformation to the interning macro.

@Zoxc Zoxc force-pushed the interner-split branch from 9fe197d to e245d69 Compare May 7, 2018 14:40
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

lgtm! You can still r- if you have any concerns, @eddyb.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 11, 2018

📌 Commit e245d69 has been approved by michaelwoerister

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 11, 2018

⌛ Testing commit e245d69 with merge fe63e47...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 11, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: michaelwoerister
Pushing fe63e47 to master...

@bors bors merged commit e245d69 into rust-lang:master May 11, 2018
@Zoxc Zoxc deleted the interner-split branch May 11, 2018 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants