Skip to content

Conversation

nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

This is a minimal diff to disable #46833 on stable (due to #48251). I have a more expansive diff for master that allows us to opt back in.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against stable. Please double check that you specified the right target!

Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you make the same change for the beta PR?

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
// we never unwind through them.

// ignore-emscripten no processes
// ignore FIXME rust-lang/rust#48251 -- temporarily disabled
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This syntax appears to not be supported; we have to use // ignore-test instead I think...

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mark-Simulacrum done

@@ -372,7 +372,9 @@ fn should_abort_on_panic<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
// unwind anyway. Don't stop them.
if tcx.has_attr(tcx.hir.local_def_id(fn_id), "unwind") { return false; }

return true;
// FIXME(rust-lang/rust#48251) -- Had to disable abort-on-panic
// for backwardsa compatibility reasons.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo, not a big deal :)

backwardsa

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you KIDDING? That is the biggest of deals.

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis added the T-core Relevant to the core team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 21, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rfcbot fcp merge

I propose that we merge this and issue a new point release -- this decision also applies to the beta PR and master PR.

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Feb 21, 2018

Team member @nikomatsakis has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Feb 21, 2018
@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Feb 22, 2018
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Feb 22, 2018

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@ashleygwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

@rfcbot reviewed

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of #48445.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-core Relevant to the core team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants