Skip to content

Conversation

goffrie
Copy link
Contributor

@goffrie goffrie commented Oct 9, 2017

... so that it includes the span of the passed arguments, not just the name of the called method.

Fixes #44760.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Oct 9, 2017

r? @oli-obk

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 9, 2017

You need to fix method-call-err-msg.rs , too. This will include the args on other errors, too. can you add examples of those errors as ui tests, so we know how they look now? Maybe just move method-call-err-msg.rs to ui tests

@carols10cents carols10cents added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Oct 9, 2017
@goffrie goffrie force-pushed the fix-method-unit-call branch from 5736fca to 53a10a4 Compare October 10, 2017 01:57
@goffrie
Copy link
Contributor Author

goffrie commented Oct 10, 2017

I moved it to ui tests. I don't know if the new output is really great though, maybe it should just point at the parens

26 | | //~^ NOTE expected 0 parameters
27 | | //~^ ERROR this function takes 1 parameter but 0 parameters were supplied
28 | | //~^ NOTE expected 1 parameter
29 | | .one()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a definite regression. It used to produce

error[E0061]: this function takes 1 parameter but 0 parameters were supplied
  --> src/main.rs:15:7
   |
5  |      fn one(self, _: isize) -> Foo { self }
   |      -------------------------------------- defined here
...
15 |      .one()     //~ ERROR this function takes 1 parameter but 0 parameters were supplied
   |       ^^^ expected 1 parameter

And we really want to keep the old report

@goffrie goffrie force-pushed the fix-method-unit-call branch from 53a10a4 to bb4d1ca Compare October 14, 2017 03:20
@goffrie
Copy link
Contributor Author

goffrie commented Oct 14, 2017

updated to keep the old error message

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 15, 2017
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 15, 2017

Lgtm now. @eddyb can you r+?

@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Oct 15, 2017

@bors r=oli-obk

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 15, 2017

📌 Commit bb4d1ca has been approved by oli-obk

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 15, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 15, 2017

⌛ Testing commit bb4d1ca with merge df095ce...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2017
Provide the full span of method calls to `check_argument_types`

... so that it includes the span of the passed arguments, not just the name of the called method.

Fixes #44760.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 15, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing df095ce to master...

@bors bors merged commit bb4d1ca into rust-lang:master Oct 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants