Skip to content

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This'll end up just creating a bunch of object files that otherwise wouldn't
exist, so skip that extra work if possible.

This'll end up just creating a bunch of object files that otherwise wouldn't
exist, so skip that extra work if possible.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

r? @michaelwoerister

@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Yes, I don't think there's a reason to do this anymore (and there never might have been one except for the pre-existing assertions). Thanks, Alex!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 5, 2017

📌 Commit a70c5cb has been approved by michaelwoerister

@shepmaster shepmaster added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 6, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 9, 2017

⌛ Testing commit a70c5cb with merge dbed066...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2017
rustc: Don't create empty codegen units

This'll end up just creating a bunch of object files that otherwise wouldn't
exist, so skip that extra work if possible.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 9, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: michaelwoerister
Pushing dbed066 to master...

@bors bors merged commit a70c5cb into rust-lang:master Oct 9, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the no-empty branch October 10, 2017 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants