Add option for stable backport poll #140039
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-meta
|
|
jieyouxu
reviewed
Apr 19, 2025
apiraino
force-pushed
the
add-option-for-stable-backport-poll
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b7f3c46 to
f582905
Compare
skip-checks: true
apiraino
force-pushed
the
add-option-for-stable-backport-poll
branch
from
f582905 to
1d87d14
Compare
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2025
…enton Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139042 (Do not remove trivial `SwitchInt` in analysis MIR) - rust-lang#139533 (add next_index to Enumerate) - rust-lang#139843 (Setup editor file associations for non-rs extensions) - rust-lang#140000 (skip llvm-config in autodiff check builds, when its unavailable) - rust-lang#140008 (Improve `clean_maybe_renamed_item` function code a bit) - rust-lang#140024 (Remove early exits from JumpThreading.) - rust-lang#140039 (Add option for stable backport poll) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#140039 - apiraino:add-option-for-stable-backport-poll, r=aDotInTheVoid Add option for stable backport poll When creating polls on Zulip about stable backport ("Do we approve the backport of `rust-lang#12345`"?), stable backports should have the option of "approving, but only is a dot release is planned" (this is a hint to t-release about how the team think important - or not - is backporting some patch). Discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/stable-nominated.3A.20.23139328/near/510037866)[#t-rustdoc > stable-nominated: rust-lang#139328 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/stable-nominated.3A.20.23139328/near/510037866) r? `@aDotInTheVoid` (feel free to adjust the wording!)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When creating polls on Zulip about stable backport ("Do we approve the backport of
#12345"?), stable backports should have the option of "approving, but only is a dot release is planned" (this is a hint to t-release about how the team think important - or not - is backporting some patch).Discussed on Zulip#t-rustdoc > stable-nominated: #139328 @ 💬
r? @aDotInTheVoid (feel free to adjust the wording!)