Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

We almost always have the backticks, except here... so let's just fix that. Barely worth a PR but it's user-visible docs so here we go.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 14, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Not a libs reviewer but this is a trivial style fix :D
r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 14, 2025

📌 Commit 5827183 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned jieyouxu and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Apr 14, 2025
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 14, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139127 (Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack)
 - rust-lang#139392 (Detect and provide suggestion for `&raw EXPR`)
 - rust-lang#139767 (Visit place in `BackwardIncompatibleDropHint` statement)
 - rust-lang#139777 (Remove `define_debug_via_print` for `ExistentialProjection`, use regular structural debug impl)
 - rust-lang#139796 (ptr docs: add missing backtics around 'usize')
 - rust-lang#139801 (Add myself to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#139804 (use `realpath` in `bootstrap.py` when creating build-dir)
 - rust-lang#139807 (Improve wording of post-merge report)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 470e4de into rust-lang:master Apr 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 14, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139796 - RalfJung:usize-backtics, r=jieyouxu

ptr docs: add missing backtics around 'usize'

We almost always have the backticks, except here... so let's just fix that. Barely worth a PR but it's user-visible docs so here we go.
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the usize-backtics branch April 15, 2025 19:46
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#139127 (Fix up partial res of segment in primitive resolution hack)
 - rust-lang#139392 (Detect and provide suggestion for `&raw EXPR`)
 - rust-lang#139767 (Visit place in `BackwardIncompatibleDropHint` statement)
 - rust-lang#139777 (Remove `define_debug_via_print` for `ExistentialProjection`, use regular structural debug impl)
 - rust-lang#139796 (ptr docs: add missing backtics around 'usize')
 - rust-lang#139801 (Add myself to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#139804 (use `realpath` in `bootstrap.py` when creating build-dir)
 - rust-lang#139807 (Improve wording of post-merge report)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants