Skip to content

Conversation

root-goblin
Copy link
Contributor

@root-goblin root-goblin commented Sep 10, 2024

Clone of #129866 with less fork syncing disaster

Page affected: doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/index.html#performance

Changes:

  • bulleted conventions
  • expanded definitions on terms used
  • more accessible language
  • merged Sequence and Map performance cost tables

r​? @workingjubilee

Page affected: doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/index.html#performance

Changes:

- bulleted conventions
- expanded definitions on terms used
- more accessible language
- merged Sequence and Map performance cost tables
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 10, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants