Skip to content

Conversation

joboet
Copy link
Member

@joboet joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Revert #109075 so that using Backtrace does not cause the ICE described in #114375. Once TAIT is in a better state, I'll reapply the PR.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 19, 2023

r? @thomcc

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 19, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Do you have any objections to adding a test like #114375 (comment) with -Zvalidate-mir, or is this too specific?

@joboet
Copy link
Member Author

joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Do you have any objections to adding a test like #114375 (comment) with -Zvalidate-mir, or is this too specific?

I think that's too specific, the old version does not use any special features like TAIT, so there should be no reason for the compiler to generate broken MIR.

@joboet
Copy link
Member Author

joboet commented Aug 19, 2023

Closing in favour of #115005.

@joboet joboet closed this Aug 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants