Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Would've made it easier to both catch and test #111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 13, 2023

r? @b-naber

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 13, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

lol, this is the error from #111494. I guess I'll wait until that PR lands.

@bors bors merged commit 521f4da into rust-lang:master May 19, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 19, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

lol wtf bors

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
…trieb

Add extra debug assertions for equality for Adt/Variant/FieldDef

Would've made it easier to both catch and test rust-lang#111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)

This is a revival of rust-lang#111523 because I think I pushed an empty branch and bors got a bit too excited it closed the PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants