Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I tried to split this up into two commits, the first where we stash the resolution error until typeck (which causes a bunch of diagnostics changes because the ordering of error messages change), then the second commit is the actual logic that actually implements the suggestion.

I am not in love with the presentation of the suggestion, so I could use some advice for how to format the actual messaging.

r? diagnostics

Fixes #102518

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 5, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 5, 2022
Copy link
Member

@davidtwco davidtwco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, I don't have much in the way of suggestions for alternate wording. r=me unless you want to make changes to the wording first.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

alrighty, this can just land as is. worst case, someone will complain about the wording in a follow-up issue 😁

@bors r=davidtwco

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 5, 2022

📌 Commit ea38370 has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 5, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102672 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS class `in-band`)
 - rust-lang#102693 (Revert "Use getentropy when possible on all Apple platforms")
 - rust-lang#102694 (Suggest calling method if fn does not exist)
 - rust-lang#102708 (Suggest `==` to wrong assign expr)
 - rust-lang#102710 (Add test for issue 82633)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 6, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #102726) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 6, 2022
@bors bors merged commit a9b3441 into rust-lang:master Oct 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 6, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the fn-to-method branch November 2, 2022 02:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When calling a function that is actually a method, mention it
6 participants