only link to easy issues in good first issues in rustc

[karolzwolak]

Right now, good first issues link to issues with the E-help-wanted label, even though this shows hard issues too (E-hard). I replaced help wanted label with E-easy label.

Rendered

[rustbot]

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[ehuss]

r? @Kobzol

[Kobzol]

There are some help-wanted issues that are not marked with E-easy, but might not be particularly hard (e.g. rust-lang/rust#137286).

I think that it is better to show more issues on the link, even if some of them will already be claimed, or not easy for a beginner, to give people inspiration, and areas into which they could look into. I don't expect that most people will actually immediately find the perfect issue for them on the given link.

[karolzwolak]

even if some of them will already be claimed

But it links only to the unclaimed issues:

rust-forge/src/how-to-start-contributing.md

Line 55 in d349ae0

[rustc-issues]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AE-help-wanted+no%3Aassignee

or not easy for a beginner, to give people inspiration, and areas into which they could look into. I don't expect that most people will actually immediately find the perfect issue for them on the given link.

Okay, valid points, so maybe the link should be called 'Help wanted' instead of 'good first issues', like rustup issues for example?

rust-forge/src/how-to-start-contributing.md

Line 50 in d349ae0

| [Rust playground][playground-repo] | | [Help wanted][playground-issues] | Rust online playground |

[Kobzol]

But it links only to the unclaimed issues:

I meant "unclaimed" as in "no one worked on them yet". You can notice that some issues on the link you posted are not strictly claimed, but already have a linked PR :) We don't actually use issue claiming that much, although for beginner issues it's more common.

Renaming the link sounds good :)

[karolzwolak]

Right, I did notice that some issues weren't claimed, but they still had a PR linked. Closing this in favor of #933.