Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Mar 5, 2021

…e sources and prints a warning if that fails

Great for spotting false positives/broken suggestions of applicable lints.

There are false positives though because I'm not sure yet how to silence rustc warnings while keeping clippy warnings.
Sometimes rustc makes a suggestion that fails to apply and the implementation does not differentiate between clippy and rustc warnings when applying lint suggestions.

changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6849) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

…e sources and prints a warning if that fails

Great for spotting false positives/broken suggestions of applicable lints.

There are false positives though becasue I'm not sure yet how to silence rustc warnings while keeping clippy warnings.
Sometimes rustc makes a suggestion that fails to apply and the implementation does not differenciate between clippy and rustc warnings when applying lint suggestions.

changelog: none
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr force-pushed the lintcheck_clippyfix branch from 3033888 to 45424c7 Compare March 5, 2021 16:17
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Mar 5, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2021

📌 Commit 45424c7 has been approved by llogiq

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 45424c7 with merge 0153679...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing 0153679 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 0153679 into rust-lang:master Mar 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants