-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
refactor(integer_division_remainder_used): move to under operators
#15953
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(integer_division_remainder_used): move to under operators
#15953
Conversation
a17a214 to
5afaff7
Compare
|
Lintcheck changes for 967d2b1
This comment will be updated if you push new changes |
5afaff7 to
5462f25
Compare
operators/operators
5462f25 to
ebcba7c
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ebcba7c to
b1bf4f3
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Could you squash the second and third commit so that no intermediate commit fails to compile?
r? samueltardieu
@rustbot author
|
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
b1bf4f3 to
967d2b1
Compare
|
@rustbot ready |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
changelog: none