-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Add new mixed_attributes_style lint
#12354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
a1319bf to
6edc3f9
Compare
|
Note for future self: run |
6edc3f9 to
1631ee3
Compare
|
And also dogfood... |
|
Ci passed. \o/ |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[allow(unused)] | ||
| #[allow(unused)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Attribute duplication might be worth another lint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dully noted.
|
Thank you! @bors r+ |
Add new `mixed_attributes_style` lint Add a new lint to detect cases where both inner and outer attributes are used on a same item. r? `@llogiq` changelog: Add new `mixed_attributes_style` lint
|
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
|
Seems completely unrelated. Retry? :3 |
|
@bors retry |
Add new `mixed_attributes_style` lint Add a new lint to detect cases where both inner and outer attributes are used on a same item. r? `@llogiq` ---- changelog: Add new [`mixed_attributes_style`] lint
|
💔 Test failed - checks-action_test |
1631ee3 to
4a228ba
Compare
|
Rebased and allowed this lint in |
4a228ba to
f301386
Compare
|
Rebased again. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
Add a new lint to detect cases where both inner and outer attributes are used on a same item.
r? @llogiq
changelog: Add new [
mixed_attributes_style] lint