Skip to content

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Currently, clippy will ignore $CARGO when spawning cargo commands, which can be problematic for cargo clippy and interop with other tools. This commit induces clippy to respect $CARGO in every case it seems likely to matter.

Fixes:

changelog: clippy now respects setting the CARGO environment variable

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2023

r? @Jarcho

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 9, 2023
@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

Jarcho commented Dec 10, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 10, 2023

📌 Commit 9083b52 has been approved by Jarcho

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 10, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 9083b52 with merge 87aed03...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 10, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Jarcho
Pushing 87aed03 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 87aed03 into rust-lang:master Dec 10, 2023
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the env-lookup-for-cargo branch December 10, 2023 02:41
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2024
…, r=onur-ozkan

Set `CARGO` instead of `PATH` for Rust Clippy

Resolves rust-lang#123227

Previously, clippy was using `cargo` from `PATH`, but since [PR](rust-lang/rust-clippy#11944), it now prioritises checking `CARGO` first.
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123386 - Rajveer100:branch-for-issue-123227, r=onur-ozkan

Set `CARGO` instead of `PATH` for Rust Clippy

Resolves rust-lang#123227

Previously, clippy was using `cargo` from `PATH`, but since [PR](rust-lang/rust-clippy#11944), it now prioritises checking `CARGO` first.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants