Skip to content

Conversation

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member

This TODO was actually from 255 where the bug was in cast_unlikely, even though the issue is labeled with or_i (my bad for not checking). There is no code for cast_unlikely as it is treated as or_i.

Addressed in 239efd5

Fixes #268

This TODO was actually from 255 where the bug was in cast_unlikely, even
though the issue is labbelled with or_i (my bad for not checking). There
is no code for `cast_unlikely` as it treated as or_i.

Addressed in 239efd5
Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK cf05787

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 7a4e4af into rust-bitcoin:master Jan 18, 2023
heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
cf0578798e2d774b41f5c8b72628c539ea9e2a6a Remove fixed TODO (sanket1729)

Pull request description:

  This TODO was actually from 255 where the bug was in cast_unlikely, even though the issue is labeled with or_i (my bad for not checking). There is no code for `cast_unlikely` as it is treated as or_i.

  Addressed in 239efd55387f1d893e6ac4e602ca11454785c375

  Fixes #268

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK cf0578798e2d774b41f5c8b72628c539ea9e2a6a

Tree-SHA512: c55236979dfaac3e104edd35eb191be20fe45b6e994a886603d9b9c5559f49723fdaa10f73eaee7e7d6f30170f948f609e0369cd65c3569585675d432661f74a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix TODO comments in types about or_i() stack depth calculation

2 participants